There are a couple of points that I don't quite understand about the ACS:
- Reserves of assets
- compensation of CEO: $659,676
- ties to pharmaceutical and chemical industries always raise questions about conflict of interests between a foundation that should put considerable efforts in cancer research and sponsors who make their money with treating cancer patients. The Cancer Prevention Coalition has a whole list of problematic ties here.
- questions about contributions to the Republican National Committee: The ACS explaines the contributions as encouragement or sponsorship of "voter registration, candidate questionnaires, or political forums. That's fine, but why not include candidates of other political parties?
It certainly proves the point that you should get all the information necessary and educate yourself about what cause you want to support, before making a commitment. I definitely learned that during the recent scandal involving the use of donations at UNICEF's German branch, which resulted in the branch losing the seal of approval from the country's leading watchdog for charities (DZI).